The victim of Unnao rape case has contacted CBI officials on Saturday (December 23, 2025). The victim has demanded that an FIR be registered against the then investigating officer for his collusion with Kuldeep Singh Sengar. The victim also claimed that she and her family were facing threats from various quarters.
This development has come to light at a time when disappointment has increased in many circles after the Delhi High Court recently granted conditional bail to Sengar and suspended his life sentence in the case. However, Sengar will remain in jail as he is also serving a 10-year sentence in the case of custodial death of the rape victim’s father.
Victim’s allegation- manipulation of facts
The victim in her complaint alleged that the investigating officer conducted the investigation maliciously and fraudulently and in such a manner so as to benefit Sengar and other accused by deliberate omission and manipulation of the facts presented and to secure a favorable outcome.
‘Fake documents were used’
She alleged that the officer used forged school documents in the charge sheet, showing her as a student of a government school and showing a different date of birth, when in fact she had never taken admission in that school.
The victim also claimed that the officer had mentioned in the chargesheet that she was using the mobile phone of a woman named Heera Singh, even though she never used that phone. Besides, several statements attributed to him have been included in the charge sheet, he claimed.
‘The officer did not take any action’
In the six-page complaint, the victim claimed that she had complained earlier also, but no action was taken against the officer. The victim was a minor at the time of the rape in 2017. Citing the trial court order convicting Sengar, where the court questioned the recording of his statement by the investigating officer, he accused the officer of colluding with the accused to shield them (Sengar and others) from prosecution.
CBI had challenged the lower court’s comments in the Delhi High Court. During the trial, the CBI had said that the investigating officer’s claims on the mobile phone used by the victim were mere opinion, not conclusive evidence, and on that basis alone, no impression could be formed that the officer was favoring the accused.
What did the court say?
The court had said, there is more to the case than meets the eye. It appears that the investigation was not conducted in a fair manner and the attitude of the Investigating Officer/CBI indicates that the statement of the girl was recorded with the objective of discrediting the statement of the victim and her family members in the present case.
