Is The Kerala Story a propaganda or agenda film? This question arises often. The film starts with a disclaimer, in which it is said that the story is inspired by some real incidents. After this, the story of three girls is shown, one from Kerala, one from Madhya Pradesh and one from Rajasthan. In such a situation, the question arises that when the story is of different states, then the name of the film should be “Kerla Story” Why was it kept?
It is shown in the film that these girls are pressurized for religious conversion and they are treated inhumanely, seeing which the audience may feel awkward. Finally the makers point out that such cases have been reported from various places. Although I personally have not heard about such cases directly, but have definitely heard discussions about them from others.
Talking about acting, Aditi Bhatia, Ulka Gupta and Aishwarya Ojha have given impressive performances. The writing is sharp and impactful, making the audience feel exactly what the makers want to show. The writing of Vipul Shah and Amarnath Jha is strong, while the direction of Kamakhya Narayan Singh is good at many places, although it seems a little weak in some parts. Overall the film tries to keep its message clearly.
Now it depends on the audience whether they consider it as agenda or propaganda or see it as a film made on social issues. For example, a story in the film is said to be inspired by the case of National Shooter Tara Shahdeo. Rating To give or not to rate is a personal choice, but it is in the hands of the audience to decide how they view such films as cinema, message or propaganda.
The Kerala Story: A film made on propaganda or social issues?
